![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Материалы Международного межуниверситетского семинара по диагностической и терапевтической радиологии Минск, 20-21 октября 2003 года |
Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Heart Disease.
Present State and New Horizons.
Prof. R. Rienmuller
Interdisciplinary Cardiac Imaging Center, University of Graz, Austria.
(Радиология в медицинской диагностике [современные технологии]
2003: 77-79)
Prevention, early recognition, staging and selection of the optimal therapy
in coronary heart disease is still the most exciting challenge in cardiac.
Today, coronary heart disease "is defined as manifestation of atherosclerosis
in the coronary arteries. As the disease is a multifactorial process leading
to myocardial ischemia it may appear as angina pectoris, myocardial infarction,
cardiac dysrhythmia, sudden death or cardiac insufficiency" (J. Meyer;
1996). The inadequate coronary blood flow results in changes of the biochemical,
electrical and mechanical function of the cardiac structures.
Current methods used in the evaluation of coronary heart disease.
Coronary angiography is still regarded as a gold standard in the evaluation
of coronary atherosclerosis. The method however is lacking the desirable amount
of sensitivity and specificity needed for early recognition of atherosclerotic
plaques and for quantification of the hemodynamic effectiveness of these lesions.
Recent studies demonstrate that intravasal ultrasound is superior in identifying
and staging of atherosclerotic plaques. Catheterisation is used for ventriculography
and/or for measuring hemodynamic and pressure data and to measure functional
determinants as preload, afterload and contractility.
For the evaluation of myocardial ischemia exercise tests using ECG, echocardiography
or radiommclide methods (SPECT) are used. However these methods are also lacking
the necessary sensitivity and specificity and possibility to measure myocardial
blood flow in absolute numbers. PET seems to be more sensitive than SPECT enabling
to measure myocardial blood flow in absolute numbers.
Present questions for non-invasive evaluation of coronary heart disease (without
acute coronary syndrom)
- Does the patient have coronary atherosclerosis?
- If positive: What is the stage of coronary atherosclerosis?
- Is this coronary atherosclerosis of haemodynamic effect?
- Does the patient have myocardial ischemia? (infarction?)
- If positive: What are the physiological and pathophysiological compensatory
mechanisms to prevent myocardial damage?
- If positive: What are the mechanisms to keep the heart in the present function?
- If positive: How effective is the collateral coronary circulation?
- How big is the individual coronary reserve?
To answer these questions we developed the "Graz One-Stop-Shop Approach"
which consists of:
1. Native single slice scan, 100ms exposure time to identify and to measure
the extent of coronary calcification.
2. Multi slice scan, 50 ms exposure time and intravenous contrast agent application
to measure myocardial blood flow.
3. Multi slice scan, 50 ms exposure time and intravenous contrast agent application
to measure functional determinants as enddiastolic and endsystolic volumes,
ejection fraction, left ventricular muscle mass and global and regional wall
thickness changes over the cardiac cycles.
4. Single slice scan, 100ms exposure time and intravenous contrast agent application
to evaluate the morphological state of the proximal 4-6cm of the subepicardial
coronary arteries.
Using EBT with the "Graz One-Stop-Shop Approach" the above mentioned
questions may be answered non-invasively on a routine daily basis in 30min by
radiation dose below lO mSv and approximately 220ccm of non-ionic contrast agent.
Based on more than 2000 cardiac EBT studies using the above mentioned protocol
it is possible like in an "One-Stop-Shop" to assess the extent of
coronary atherosclerosis as Coronary Calcium Score (first part of the definition
of coronary heart disease) to evaluate the degree, location and number of stenotic
lesions in the proximal 5-6cm of the coronary arteries, to determine the severity
of coronary heart disease by measuring the global and regional myocardial blood
flow ( second part of the definition of coronary heart disease ) and to measure
the functional left ventricular parameters giving the information if they are
still in normal range or changed either as a sequel of the coronary heart disease
or as a compensatory mechanism to keep myocardial blood flow as adequate as
possible with respect to the balance of oxygen supply and demand.
Present experience using Multislice and Multidector CT and MR systems in patients
without acute coronary syndrom:
The new advanced multidetector CT technology is coming very close to EBT technology
in the evaluation of coronary calcification soft plaques and coronary arteries
showing encouraging results.
Similar to EBT a new "Graz One-Stop-Shop Approach" for MR studies
of the heart in patients without acute coronary syndrome was developed in our
"Interdisciplinary Cardiac Imaging Center". In contrast to EBT using
MR this approach is more time consuming and it requires more patients cooperation
to image the coronary arteries. The evaluation of the functional-parameters
is possible with higher degree of accuracy than by EBT because of the higher
contrast resolution of MR. There are encouraging results and approaches to evaluate
myocardial perfusion after intravenous contrast agent applications. The continuous
progress in MR technology is very promising that in the near future MR will
be used in clinical routine in patients with known or suspected coronary heart
disease. Especially there are very interesting results in blood flow measurements
not only in the great cardiac vessels but also intraventriculary and in the
proximal coronary arteries. These flow measurements will increase our understanding
of the determinants of myocardial blood flow and perfusion.
New horizon.
Does it mean all relevant questions of coronary heart disease are going to be
answered today and in the very next future by the described methods?
The answer is simply: no.
Additionally to the acute coronary syndrome there are many open questions in
coronary heart disease and we have to go to learn and to expand our understanding
of the disease with respect to ethiology, epidemiology, course but especially
in the mechanism of the disease and its functional controlling when we really
plan to improve our diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Therefore we have to study intensively the mechanism of intracavitary and intravascular
flow, pulmonary, blood and myocardial cell gas exchange, myocardial metabolism
and include molecular biology and genetic and computer science.
Although the heart and the lung represent two different organs, each has it's
own specific function, both organs are characterized by closed functional interaction
and therefore it is for clinical as well as for experimental purposes necessary
and important to consider and to evaluate both of them simultaneously.
The final goal, the new horizon, in cardiac radiology presents a project of
"anatomical and functional 3D visualisation" of the heart and the
lungs, which will allow to study and to evaluate cardiac morphology, function,
myocardial perfusion, global and regional pulmonary ventilation, pulmonary blood
flow and its distribution during breathing in vitro and in experimental models.
For this, no question about, ambitious task there will be an increased need
for interdisciplinary collaborations of all interested and involved in the heart
and lungs and their pathology to reduce the morbidity and mortality and to increase
the effectiveness of the medical care of our patients.
|